World Cup Fever Is Here! Choose your broker like you choose your team
Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Elon Musk, the world's richest man and chief executive of electric car maker Tesla Inc., said that U.S. President Joe Biden's call for higher taxes on America's super-rich would only hurt low and middle-income classes.

Elon Musk, the world's richest man and chief executive of electric car maker Tesla Inc., said over the weekend that U.S. President Joe Biden's call for higher taxes on America's super-rich would only hurt low and middle-income classes.
He tweeted, “I agree that we should make elaborate tax avoidance schemes illegal, but doing so would upset a lot of donors, so we'll see talk but no action.” Those who will actually be forced to bear the burden of excessive government spending are low - and middle-income earners, because they cannot escape payroll taxes.
Musk's tweet was in response to a tweet from Biden, who had earlier tweeted: “It's about time the super-wealthy start paying their fair share.” Biden noted that while the number of billionaires in the United States has grown to about 1,000, they pay only about 8% of their income in taxes.
According to a White House fact sheet released Saturday, which notes that many wealthy people pay lower tax rates than middle-class workers. “But when a billionaire earns income because their investments increase in value, that gain is too often never taxed at all.”



Tax the rich to replenish the Treasury
Earlier, the White House announced that as part of the 2023 fiscal year budget, the Biden administration would propose a minimum 20% tax on the wealthiest households in the United States, covering unrealized gains on assets such as stocks. If passed by Congress, the “rich tax” proposal would help reduce the U.S. deficit by about $360 billion over the next 10 years.
The Biden administration says this is due to a combination of job losses, reduced earnings, tax credits, and incentives under the pandemic. In response to the epidemic, the US government launched massive stimulus measures, and with the growing debt burden, raising taxes became a necessary measure.
On the other hand, the rich are getting richer under the epidemic, but the existing tax policy is difficult to tax the “unrealized gains” of the rich, and the most prominent feature of Biden's “rich tax” is that it covers this part of the “unrealized gains”.
The main reason many wealthy Americans have paid no federal income taxes in some years is that their primary source of wealth is not wages, but stocks, and if they do not sell stocks, they can avoid some of the tax liability.
As a result, wealthy families would have to pay 20 percent of their “entire income” in taxes under Biden's proposal, which would include the value of assets such as stocks.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!

Have you experienced issues with Pepperstone deposit & withdrawal processing? From your experience, do you feel that the Australia-based forex broker causes losses to its clients? Did the brokerage entity freeze your account and give you a margin call? All these trading allegations have been rampant on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This Pepperstone review article takes a close look at the user complaints, especially in 2026. Additionally, we have given an overview of the regulatory framework under which the brokerage entity operates.

Some broker comparisons end with a confident "go with this one." This is not one of them — and that honesty is exactly what makes it worth reading. Wundersys and tradgrip are two young, offshore-registered brokers that keep popping up in front of beginner traders, often through aggressive online marketing. Both promise the usual buffet: tight spreads, generous leverage, multiple account tiers. And both, according to WikiFX, sit near the very bottom of the safety scale. So instead of crowning a champion, this comparison is really about something more useful: learning to read the warning signs, understanding the small differences that still matter, and knowing why "the better of two risky options" is still a conversation about risk.

If you trade forex from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or Nepal, you already know the quiet truth that eats into every trader's results: it is not just the market that decides whether you profit — it is the cost of getting in and out of each trade. Shave a couple of dollars off your commission on every lot, multiply it across hundreds of trades a year, and you are looking at the difference between a strategy that works and one that bleeds out slowly. South Asian traders are some of the most cost-conscious in the world, and rightly so. So we pulled the data on the brokers most often recommended for the region, cross-checked every name on WikiFX, and ranked them by the one number that matters most here: what they actually charge you to trade. Before the list, one quick lesson that will make this whole ranking click.